- Home/
- Comparison/
- Timber Loader/
- Tigercat 220C vs. Caterpillar 320D FM
Tigercat 220C vs. Caterpillar 320D FM
1 reasons to buy Tigercat 220C:
Motor
Effective power | 119.3 kW and 117.1 kW | 2 % more or 2.2 kW |
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 320D FM:
Swing device
Rotation speed | 11.5 rev / min and 7 rev / min | 39 % more or 4.5 rev |
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 260 l. and 225 l. | 13 % more or 35 l. |
Fuel Capacity | 410 l. and 378 l. | 8 % more or 32 l. |
Boom/section specifications 1
Load-transfer length | 13620 mm and 4570 mm | 66 % more or 9050 mm |
Maximum radius on ground level | 10000 mm and 8430 mm | 16 % more or 1570 mm |
Maximum height | 12750 mm and 7600 mm | 40 % more or 5150 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 2590 mm and 3290 mm |
Rear platform swing radius | 2310 mm and 2774 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 11657.3 kg and 30300 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
Model | QSB6.7 3 level and C6.4 |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 2590 mm | 2. Overall width | 3290 mm |
8. Rear platform swing radius | 2310 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2774 mm |
Boom/section specifications 1
1. Load-transfer length | 4570 mm | 1. Load-transfer length | 13620 mm |
9. Maximum height | 7600 mm | 9. Maximum height | 12750 mm |
10. Maximum radius on ground level | 8430 mm | 10. Maximum radius on ground level | 10000 mm |