- Home/
- Comparison/
- Timber Loader/
- Tigercat 230C vs. Caterpillar 320C FM
Tigercat 230C vs. Caterpillar 320C FM
2 reasons to buy Tigercat 230C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 80 amperes and 50 amperes | 37 % more or 30 amperes |
Motor
| Effective power | 119.3 kW and 106.6 kW | 11 % more or 12.7 kW |
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar 320C FM:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 11.5 rev / min and 8 rev / min | 30 % more or 3.5 rev |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 400 l. and 378 l. | 5 % more or 22 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 240 l. and 227.1 l. | 5 % more or 12.9 l. |
Boom/section specifications 1
| Maximum radius on ground level | 10980 mm and 9140 mm | 17 % more or 1840 mm |
| Maximum height | 12630 mm and 7600 mm | 40 % more or 5030 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Rear platform swing radius | 2410 mm and 2719 mm |
| Overall width | 2590 mm and 3310 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
| Model | QSB6.7 3 level and 3066T diesel |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 2590 mm | 2. Overall width | 3310 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2410 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2719 mm |
Boom/section specifications 1
| 9. Maximum height | 7600 mm | 9. Maximum height | 12630 mm |
| 10. Maximum radius on ground level | 9140 mm | 10. Maximum radius on ground level | 10980 mm |