- Home/
- Comparison/
- Timber Loader/
- Tigercat 230C vs. Caterpillar 324D FM
Tigercat 230C vs. Caterpillar 324D FM
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 324D FM:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 10 rev / min and 8 rev / min | 20 % more or 2 rev |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 245 l. and 227.1 l. | 7 % more or 17.9 l. |
| Fuel Capacity | 520 l. and 378 l. | 27 % more or 142 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 140.2 kW and 119.3 kW | 15 % more or 20.9 kW |
Boom/section specifications 1
| Maximum radius on ground level | 11500 mm and 9140 mm | 21 % more or 2360 mm |
| Maximum height | 13000 mm and 7600 mm | 42 % more or 5400 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 2590 mm and 3620 mm |
| Rear platform swing radius | 2410 mm and 2940 mm |
Operation
| Generator current strength | 80 amperes and 80 amperes |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
| Working weight | 13063.5 kg and 34300 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
| Model | QSB6.7 3 level and C7 Acert |
Boom/section specifications 1
| Option - Boom/Section 1 | boom and Under/Under |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 2590 mm | 2. Overall width | 3620 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2410 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2940 mm |
Boom/section specifications 1
| 9. Maximum height | 7600 mm | 9. Maximum height | 14000 mm |
| 10. Maximum radius on ground level | 9140 mm | 10. Maximum radius on ground level | 12000 mm |