- Home/
- Comparison/
- Timber Loader/
- Tigercat 234 vs. Doosan DX300LL
Tigercat 234 vs. Doosan DX300LL
1 reasons to buy Tigercat 234:
Boom/section specifications 1
| Maximum load-carrying capacity over front part at zero level | 15875 kg and 12959 kg | 18 % more or 2916 kg |
5 reasons to buy Doosan DX300LL:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 9.9 rev / min and 9 rev / min | 9 % more or 0.9 rev |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 480 l. and 227 l. | 53 % more or 253 l. |
| Fuel Capacity | 500 l. and 378 l. | 24 % more or 122 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 146.9 kW and 129 kW | 12 % more or 17.9 kW |
Boom/section specifications 1
| Maximum height | 13580 mm and 7600 mm | 44 % more or 5980 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 2590 mm and 3600 mm |
| Rear platform swing radius | 2790 mm and 3200 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
| Working weight | 14855.1 kg and 35099.4 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Doosan |
| Model | QSB6.7 3 level and DL08 |
Hydraulic system
| Type of pump | load sensing and axial piston |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 2590 mm | 2. Overall width | 3600 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2790 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 3200 mm |
Boom/section specifications 1
| 9. Maximum height | 7600 mm | 9. Maximum height | 13580 mm |