- Home/
- Comparison/
- Timber Loader/
- Tigercat 234 vs. Doosan S225LL
Tigercat 234 vs. Doosan S225LL
3 reasons to buy Tigercat 234:
Motor
| Effective power | 129 kW and 110.4 kW | 14 % more or 18.6 kW |
Boom/section specifications 1
| Load-transfer length | 9750 mm and 4984 mm | 49 % more or 4766 mm |
| Maximum load-carrying capacity over front part at zero level | 15875 kg and 12011 kg | 24 % more or 3864 kg |
1 reasons to buy Doosan S225LL:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 12 rev / min and 9 rev / min | 25 % more or 3 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 2590 mm and 3500 mm |
| Rear platform swing radius | 2790 mm and 2750 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 14855.1 kg and 27442.3 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Doosan |
| Model | QSB6.7 3 level and DB58TIS |
Hydraulic system
| Type of pump | load sensing and axial piston |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 2590 mm | 2. Overall width | 3500 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2790 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2750 mm |
Boom/section specifications 1
| 1. Load-transfer length | 9750 mm | 1. Load-transfer length | 4984 mm |