- Home/
- Comparison/
- Timber Loader/
- Tigercat S860C vs. Caterpillar 324D FM
Tigercat S860C vs. Caterpillar 324D FM
4 reasons to buy Tigercat S860C:
Sizes
| Clearance | 795 mm and 710 mm | 11 % more or 85 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 520 l. | 46 % more or 450 l. |
| Generator current strength | 140 amperes and 80 amperes | 43 % more or 60 amperes |
Motor
| Effective power | 223.7 kW and 140.2 kW | 37 % more or 83.5 kW |
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar 324D FM:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 10 rev / min and 7 rev / min | 30 % more or 3 rev |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 245 l. and 190 l. | 22 % more or 55 l. |
Boom/section specifications 1
| Load-transfer height | 3310 mm and 3300 mm | 0 % more or 10 mm |
| Maximum radius on ground level | 11500 mm and 10870 mm | 5 % more or 630 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3630 mm and 3620 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 33660 kg and 34300 kg |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Model | QSL9 and C7 Acert |
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 915 mm and 700 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3630 mm | 2. Overall width | 3620 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 795 mm | 5. Clearance | 710 mm |
Boom/section specifications 1
| 3. Load-transfer height | 3300 mm | 3. Load-transfer height | 3310 mm |
| 10. Maximum radius on ground level | 10870 mm | 10. Maximum radius on ground level | 12000 mm |