vs.

      Caterpillar 525 vs. Ranger F65C

      10 reasons to buy Caterpillar 525:

      Operation

      Hydraulic system fluid volume 74 l. and 63 l. 15 % more or 11 l.
      Generator current strength 75 amperes and 65 amperes 13 % more or 10 amperes
      Fuel Capacity 265 l. and 152 l. 43 % more or 113 l.
      Cooling system fluid volume 36 l. and 28 l. 22 % more or 8 l.
      Engine oil volume 19 l. and 9.1 l. 52 % more or 9.9 l.

      Motor

      Full power 130.5 kW and 86.5 kW 34 % more or 44.0 kW
      Effective power 119.3 kW and 77.6 kW 35 % more or 41.7 kW
      Displacement 7 l. and 3.9 l. 44 % more or 3.1 l.

      Gear box

      Forward gears number 4 and 3 25 % more or 1
      Maximum forward speed 27.2 km/h and 9.5 km/h 65 % more or 17.7 km/h

      2 reasons to buy Ranger F65C:

      Sizes

      Maximum traction force on a rope with empty drum 139.8 kN and 88.1 kN 37 % more or 51.7 kN
      Maximum line speed 89 m/min and 29.3 m/min 67 % more or 59.7 m/min

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Height to cab upper part 3050 mm and 2946 mm
      Overall width 3130 mm and 2714 mm

      Operation

      Operating voltage 24 V and 12 V
      Working weight 15200 kg and 7893 kg
      Tyre size 23.1-26 and 18.4x34

      Motor

      Cylinders number 4 and 4
      Manufacturer Caterpillar and BT
      Model 3304 DIT and Cummins 4A 3.9

      Images

      Sizes

      2. Overall width 3130 mm 2. Overall width 2714 mm
      3. Height to cab upper part 3050 mm 3. Height to cab upper part 2946 mm