- Home/
- Comparison/
- Skidding Tractor (Skidder)/
- Tigercat 635C vs. Ranger F68G
Tigercat 635C vs. Ranger F68G
5 reasons to buy Tigercat 635C:
Sizes
Clearance | 635 mm and 533 mm | 16 % more or 102 mm |
Grapple load capacity - tongs tip to tip | 2 m2 and 1.4 m2 | 30 % more or 0.6 m2 |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 350 l. and 318 l. | 9 % more or 32 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 105 l. and 64.4 l. | 39 % more or 40.6 l. |
Motor
Full power | 186.4 kW and 167 kW | 10 % more or 19.4 kW |
3 reasons to buy Ranger F68G:
Operation
Generator current strength | 65 amperes and 24 amperes | 63 % more or 41 amperes |
Gear box
Forward gears number | 3 and 1 | 67 % more or 2 |
Maximum forward speed | 26.9 km/h and 13.5 km/h | 50 % more or 13.4 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 3150 mm and 2997 mm |
Wheelbase | 5080 mm and 3759 mm |
Overall width | 3330 mm and 3289 mm |
Operation
Tyre size | Front 30.5 x 32, Rear 28L x 26 and 30.5x32 |
Working weight | 22680 kg and 17218.4 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Model | QSC8.3 and 6CTA 8.3 |
Hydraulic system
Type of pump | axial piston pumps with variable displacement and gear type pump |
Gear box
Transmission type | single-speed mechanical, hydrostatic with variable speed and Clark R32320 |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3289 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3150 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2997 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 5080 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3759 mm |
5. Clearance | 635 mm | 5. Clearance | 533 mm |