- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Dump Truck/
- Caterpillar 170 vs. Komatsu 930E-4
Caterpillar 170 vs. Komatsu 930E-4
1 reasons to buy Caterpillar 170:
Weight
Loaded front weight distribution | 33.3 % and 33 % | 1 % more or 0.3 % |
7 reasons to buy Komatsu 930E-4:
Weight
Loaded rear weight distribution | 67 % and 66.7 % | 0 % more or 0.3 % |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 4542 l. and 3218 l. | 29 % more or 1324 l. |
Motor
Effective power | 1902 kW and 1005.2 kW | 47 % more or 896.8 kW |
Displacement | 60 l. and 51.8 l. | 14 % more or 8.2 l. |
Gear box
Maximum speed | 64.5 km/h and 54 km/h | 16 % more or 10.5 km/h |
Dump
Brimmed lifting capacity | 171 m3 and 56.9 m3 | 67 % more or 114.1 m3 |
Lifting capacity with top | 211 m3 and 78.2 m3 | 63 % more or 132.8 m3 |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
Weight without load | 249480 kg and 210187 kg |
Unloaded front weight distribution | 47 % and 47 % |
Unloaded rear weight distribution | 53 % and 53 % |
Sizes
Headroom | 5770 mm and 7370 mm |
Wheelbase | 5180 mm and 6350 mm |
Unloading height | 11210 mm and 14020 mm |
Dimensional length | 11020 mm and 15600 mm |
Overall width | 6640 mm and 8690 mm |
Operation
Tyre size | 33R51 and 53/80R63 |
Motor
Manufacturer | BT and Komatsu |
Model | 3512A and SSDA16V160 |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 11020 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 15600 mm |
2. Overall width | 6640 mm | 2. Overall width | 8690 mm |
3. Headroom | 5770 mm | 3. Headroom | 7370 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 5180 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 6350 mm |
6. Unloading height | 11210 mm | 6. Unloading height | 14020 mm |


