- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Dump Truck/
- Caterpillar 170 vs. Komatsu HD325-3
Caterpillar 170 vs. Komatsu HD325-3
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 170:
Weight
| Loaded front weight distribution | 33.3 % and 32 % | 4 % more or 1.3 % |
| Unloaded rear weight distribution | 53 % and 52 % | 2 % more or 1 % |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 3218 l. and 500 l. | 84 % more or 2718 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 1081.3 kW and 326.6 kW | 70 % more or 754.7 kW |
| Displacement | 51.8 l. and 18.8 l. | 64 % more or 33.0 l. |
Dump
| Lifting capacity with top | 78.2 m3 and 24 m3 | 69 % more or 54.2 m3 |
3 reasons to buy Komatsu HD325-3:
Weight
| Loaded rear weight distribution | 68 % and 66.7 % | 2 % more or 1.3 % |
| Unloaded front weight distribution | 48 % and 47 % | 2 % more or 1 % |
Gear box
| Maximum speed | 62 km/h and 54 km/h | 13 % more or 8 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Weight without load | 249480 kg and 26600 kg |
| Laden weight | 153760 kg and 58600 kg |
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 11020 mm and 7650 mm |
| Overall width | 6640 mm and 3670 mm |
| Headroom | 5770 mm and 3950 mm |
| Wheelbase | 5180 mm and 3750 mm |
| Unloading height | 11210 mm and 7620 mm |
Operation
| Tyre size | 33R51 and 18.00-33-28 |
Motor
| Manufacturer | BT and Cummins |
| Model | 3512A and KT1150 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 11020 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 7650 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 6640 mm | 2. Overall width | 3670 mm |
| 3. Headroom | 5770 mm | 3. Headroom | 3950 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 5180 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3750 mm |
| 6. Unloading height | 11210 mm | 6. Unloading height | 7620 mm |