- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Dump Truck/
- Caterpillar 170 vs. Komatsu HD465-2
Caterpillar 170 vs. Komatsu HD465-2
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 170:
Weight
Unloaded rear weight distribution | 53 % and 52 % | 2 % more or 1 % |
Loaded front weight distribution | 33.3 % and 32 % | 4 % more or 1.3 % |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 3218 l. and 780 l. | 76 % more or 2438 l. |
Motor
Full power | 1081.3 kW and 506.3 kW | 53 % more or 575.0 kW |
Displacement | 51.8 l. and 28 l. | 46 % more or 23.8 l. |
Dump
Lifting capacity with top | 78.2 m3 and 34.2 m3 | 56 % more or 44.0 m3 |
3 reasons to buy Komatsu HD465-2:
Weight
Unloaded front weight distribution | 48 % and 47 % | 2 % more or 1 % |
Loaded rear weight distribution | 68 % and 66.7 % | 2 % more or 1.3 % |
Gear box
Maximum speed | 65 km/h and 54 km/h | 17 % more or 11 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
Laden weight | 153760 kg and 82555 kg |
Weight without load | 249480 kg and 36500 kg |
Sizes
Dimensional length | 11020 mm and 9000 mm |
Overall width | 6640 mm and 4050 mm |
Headroom | 5770 mm and 4250 mm |
Wheelbase | 5180 mm and 4250 mm |
Unloading height | 11210 mm and 8500 mm |
Operation
Tyre size | 33R51 and 21.00-35-32PR |
Motor
Manufacturer | BT and Cummins |
Model | 3512A and VTA-1710-C |
Images
Sizes
6. Unloading height | 11210 mm | 6. Unloading height | 8500 mm |
1. Dimensional length | 11020 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 9000 mm |
2. Overall width | 6640 mm | 2. Overall width | 4050 mm |
3. Headroom | 5770 mm | 3. Headroom | 4250 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 5180 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 4250 mm |


