- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Dump Truck/
- Caterpillar 769C vs. Komatsu HD465-5
Caterpillar 769C vs. Komatsu HD465-5
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 769C:
Weight
Loaded front weight distribution | 33.3 % and 32 % | 4 % more or 1.3 % |
Unloaded front weight distribution | 49.6 % and 47 % | 5 % more or 2.6 % |
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 364 l. and 95 l. | 74 % more or 269 l. |
Motor
Cylinders number | 8 and 6 | 25 % more or 2 |
Gear box
Maximum speed | 75.2 km/h and 70 km/h | 7 % more or 5.2 km/h |
Dump
Lifting time | 11 sec and 11.5 sec | 4 % less or 0.5 sec |
11 reasons to buy Komatsu HD465-5:
Weight
Loaded rear weight distribution | 68 % and 67.7 % | 0 % more or 0.3 % |
Unloaded rear weight distribution | 53 % and 50.4 % | 5 % more or 2.6 % |
Operation
Engine oil volume | 52 l. and 45 l. | 13 % more or 7 l. |
Differential/final drive fluid volume | 126.5 l. and 83 l. | 34 % more or 43.5 l. |
Fuel Capacity | 780 l. and 530 l. | 32 % more or 250 l. |
Cooling system fluid volume | 171 l. and 113.5 l. | 34 % more or 57.5 l. |
Motor
Full power | 551.1 kW and 353.5 kW | 36 % more or 197.6 kW |
Effective power | 533.2 kW and 335.6 kW | 37 % more or 197.6 kW |
Displacement | 23.2 l. and 18 l. | 22 % more or 5.2 l. |
Dump
Brimmed lifting capacity | 25 m3 and 17.5 m3 | 30 % more or 7.5 m3 |
Lifting capacity with top | 34.2 m3 and 23.6 m3 | 31 % more or 10.6 m3 |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
Weight without load | 30675 kg and 42500 kg |
Laden weight | 67586 kg and 96100 kg |
Operation
Tyre size | 18-33 28 PR and 24.00R35 |
Motor
Power measured at | 2000 rev / min and 2000 rev / min |
Aspiration | twin turbocharging and turbocharging |
Model | 3408 and SAA6D170E |
Gear box
Transmission type | electronically controlled gear shifting under load and automatic |
Forward gears number | 7 and 7 |
Reverse gears number | 1 and 1 |
Dump
Nominal payload | 36741 kg and 49895.2 kg |