vs.

      Caterpillar 772 vs. Komatsu HD465-5

      7 reasons to buy Caterpillar 772:

      Weight

      Unloaded front weight distribution 48 % and 47 % 2 % more or 1 %
      Loaded front weight distribution 34 % and 32 % 6 % more or 2 %

      Operation

      Engine oil volume 53 l. and 52 l. 2 % more or 1 l.
      Differential/final drive fluid volume 159 l. and 126.5 l. 20 % more or 32.5 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 155 l. and 95 l. 39 % more or 60 l.

      Gear box

      Maximum speed 79.7 km/h and 70 km/h 12 % more or 9.7 km/h

      Dump

      Lifting time 8.1 sec and 11.5 sec 30 % less or 3.4 sec

      10 reasons to buy Komatsu HD465-5:

      Weight

      Unloaded rear weight distribution 53 % and 52 % 2 % more or 1 %
      Loaded rear weight distribution 68 % and 66 % 3 % more or 2 %

      Operation

      Cooling system fluid volume 171 l. and 114 l. 33 % more or 57 l.
      Fuel Capacity 780 l. and 530 l. 32 % more or 250 l.

      Motor

      Displacement 23.2 l. and 18.1 l. 22 % more or 5.1 l.
      Full power 551.1 kW and 446 kW 19 % more or 105.1 kW
      Effective power 533.2 kW and 399 kW 25 % more or 134.2 kW
      Power measured at 2000 rev / min and 1800 rev / min 10 % more or 200 rev

      Dump

      Brimmed lifting capacity 25 m3 and 23.3 m3 7 % more or 1.7 m3
      Lifting capacity with top 34.2 m3 and 31.3 m3 8 % more or 2.9 m3

      Neutral reasons:

      Weight

      Weight without load 35450 kg and 42500 kg
      Laden weight 82100 kg and 96100 kg

      Operation

      Tyre size 21.00R33(E4) and 24.00R35

      Motor

      Manufacturer Caterpillar and Komatsu
      Cylinders number 6 and 6
      Model C18 ACERT and SAA6D170E
      Aspiration turbocharging and turbocharging

      Gear box

      Transmission type gear type pump and automatic
      Forward gears number 7 and 7
      Reverse gears number 1 and 1

      Dump

      Nominal payload 45359.2 kg and 49895.2 kg

      Images