- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Dump Truck/
- Caterpillar 775F vs. Komatsu HD605-5
Caterpillar 775F vs. Komatsu HD605-5
12 reasons to buy Caterpillar 775F:
Weight
Unloaded front weight distribution | 49 % and 45 % | 8 % more or 4 % |
Loaded front weight distribution | 33 % and 32 % | 3 % more or 1 % |
Operation
Cooling system fluid volume | 175 l. and 171 l. | 2 % more or 4 l. |
Engine oil volume | 72 l. and 52 l. | 28 % more or 20 l. |
Differential/final drive fluid volume | 155 l. and 126.5 l. | 18 % more or 28.5 l. |
Motor
Effective power | 552 kW and 533.2 kW | 3 % more or 18.8 kW |
Displacement | 27 l. and 23.2 l. | 14 % more or 3.8 l. |
Full power | 587 kW and 551.1 kW | 6 % more or 35.9 kW |
Cylinders number | 12 and 6 | 50 % more or 6 |
Dump
Brimmed lifting capacity | 32 m3 and 29 m3 | 9 % more or 3 m3 |
Lifting capacity with top | 41.9 m3 and 40 m3 | 5 % more or 1.9 m3 |
Lifting time | 9.5 sec and 11.5 sec | 17 % less or 2.0 sec |
5 reasons to buy Komatsu HD605-5:
Weight
Unloaded rear weight distribution | 55 % and 51 % | 7 % more or 4 % |
Loaded rear weight distribution | 68 % and 67 % | 1 % more or 1 % |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 780 l. and 700 l. | 10 % more or 80 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 95 l. and 72 l. | 24 % more or 23 l. |
Gear box
Maximum speed | 70 km/h and 67.5 km/h | 4 % more or 2.5 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
Weight without load | 48004 kg and 47825 kg |
Laden weight | 109770 kg and 108075 kg |
Operation
Tyre size | 24.00R35(E4) and 24.00R35 |
Motor
Power measured at | 2000 rev / min and 2000 rev / min |
Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Komatsu |
Model | C27 ACERT and SAA6D170E |
Gear box
Forward gears number | 7 and 7 |
Reverse gears number | 1 and 1 |
Transmission type | gear type pump and automatic |
Dump
Nominal payload | 63502.9 kg and 57152.6 kg |
Images


