- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Dump Truck/
- Caterpillar 785 vs. Komatsu HD320-3
Caterpillar 785 vs. Komatsu HD320-3
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 785:
Weight
Loaded front weight distribution | 33 % and 32 % | 3 % more or 1 % |
Unloaded rear weight distribution | 53 % and 52 % | 2 % more or 1 % |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 1893 l. and 500 l. | 74 % more or 1393 l. |
Motor
Full power | 1029 kW and 302 kW | 71 % more or 727 kW |
Displacement | 51.8 l. and 14 l. | 73 % more or 37.8 l. |
Dump
Lifting capacity with top | 78 m3 and 24 m3 | 69 % more or 54 m3 |
3 reasons to buy Komatsu HD320-3:
Weight
Loaded rear weight distribution | 68 % and 67 % | 1 % more or 1 % |
Unloaded front weight distribution | 48 % and 47 % | 2 % more or 1 % |
Gear box
Maximum speed | 62 km/h and 56 km/h | 10 % more or 6 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
Weight without load | 96353 kg and 25750 kg |
Laden weight | 249433 kg and 57750 kg |
Sizes
Dimensional length | 11020 mm and 7650 mm |
Overall width | 6630 mm and 3670 mm |
Headroom | 5770 mm and 3850 mm |
Wheelbase | 5180 mm and 3750 mm |
Unloading height | 11200 mm and 7520 mm |
Operation
Tyre size | 33.00-51 50PR (E-4) and 18.00-25-32 |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
Model | 3512 and NTA855 |
Gear box
Forward gears number | 6 and 6 |
Dump
Nominal payload | 136077.7 kg and 29029.9 kg |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 11020 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 7650 mm |
2. Overall width | 6630 mm | 2. Overall width | 3670 mm |
3. Headroom | 5770 mm | 3. Headroom | 3850 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 5180 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3750 mm |
6. Unloading height | 11200 mm | 6. Unloading height | 7520 mm |