- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Dump Truck/
- Komatsu HD325-3 vs. Caterpillar 170
Komatsu HD325-3 vs. Caterpillar 170
3 reasons to buy Komatsu HD325-3:
Weight
Loaded rear weight distribution | 68 % and 66.7 % | 2 % more or 1.3 % |
Unloaded front weight distribution | 48 % and 47 % | 2 % more or 1 % |
Gear box
Maximum speed | 62 km/h and 54 km/h | 13 % more or 8 km/h |
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 170:
Weight
Loaded front weight distribution | 33.3 % and 32 % | 4 % more or 1.3 % |
Unloaded rear weight distribution | 53 % and 52 % | 2 % more or 1 % |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 3218 l. and 500 l. | 84 % more or 2718 l. |
Motor
Displacement | 51.8 l. and 18.8 l. | 64 % more or 33.0 l. |
Full power | 1081.3 kW and 326.6 kW | 70 % more or 754.7 kW |
Dump
Lifting capacity with top | 78.2 m3 and 24 m3 | 69 % more or 54.2 m3 |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
Weight without load | 26600 kg and 249480 kg |
Laden weight | 58600 kg and 153760 kg |
Sizes
Dimensional length | 7650 mm and 11020 mm |
Overall width | 3670 mm and 6640 mm |
Headroom | 3950 mm and 5770 mm |
Wheelbase | 3750 mm and 5180 mm |
Unloading height | 7620 mm and 11210 mm |
Operation
Tyre size | 18.00-33-28 and 33R51 |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and BT |
Model | KT1150 and 3512A |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 7650 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 11020 mm |
2. Overall width | 3670 mm | 2. Overall width | 6640 mm |
3. Headroom | 3950 mm | 3. Headroom | 5770 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 3750 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 5180 mm |
6. Unloading height | 7620 mm | 6. Unloading height | 11210 mm |