vs.

      Komatsu HD325-3 vs. Caterpillar 69D ejector

      2 reasons to buy Komatsu HD325-3:

      Weight

      Loaded front weight distribution 32 % and 31 % 3 % more or 1 %

      Dump

      Lifting capacity with top 24 m3 and 18.2 m3 24 % more or 5.8 m3

      6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 69D ejector:

      Weight

      Loaded rear weight distribution 69 % and 68 % 1 % more or 1 %

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 530 l. and 500 l. 6 % more or 30 l.

      Motor

      Full power 380.3 kW and 326.6 kW 14 % more or 53.7 kW

      Gear box

      Forward gears number 8 and 6 25 % more or 2
      Reverse gears number 2 and 1 50 % more or 1
      Maximum speed 76.6 km/h and 62 km/h 19 % more or 14.6 km/h

      Neutral reasons:

      Weight

      Weight without load 26600 kg and 35607 kg

      Sizes

      Dimensional length 7650 mm and 7830 mm
      Overall width 3670 mm and 3665 mm
      Headroom 3950 mm and 3442 mm

      Operation

      Tyre size 18.00-33-28 and 18x33 2 ** Radial

      Motor

      Manufacturer Cummins and Caterpillar
      Model KT1150 and 3408E HEUI

      Dump

      Nominal payload 29029.9 kg and 36287.4 kg

      Images

      Sizes

      1. Dimensional length 7650 mm 1. Dimensional length 7830 mm
      2. Overall width 3670 mm 2. Overall width 3665 mm
      3. Headroom 3950 mm 3. Headroom 3442 mm