vs.

      Komatsu HD325-3 vs. Komatsu HD605-5

      2 reasons to buy Komatsu HD325-3:

      Weight

      Unloaded front weight distribution 48 % and 45 % 6 % more or 3 %

      Operation

      Hydraulic system fluid volume 110 l. and 95 l. 14 % more or 15 l.

      10 reasons to buy Komatsu HD605-5:

      Weight

      Unloaded rear weight distribution 55 % and 52 % 5 % more or 3 %

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 780 l. and 500 l. 36 % more or 280 l.
      Cooling system fluid volume 171 l. and 133 l. 22 % more or 38 l.
      Engine oil volume 52 l. and 38 l. 27 % more or 14 l.
      Differential/final drive fluid volume 126.5 l. and 71 l. 44 % more or 55.5 l.

      Motor

      Full power 551.1 kW and 326.6 kW 41 % more or 224.5 kW
      Displacement 23.2 l. and 18.8 l. 19 % more or 4.4 l.

      Gear box

      Forward gears number 7 and 6 14 % more or 1
      Maximum speed 70 km/h and 62 km/h 11 % more or 8 km/h

      Dump

      Lifting capacity with top 40 m3 and 24 m3 40 % more or 16 m3

      Neutral reasons:

      Weight

      Weight without load 26600 kg and 47825 kg
      Laden weight 58600 kg and 108075 kg
      Loaded front weight distribution 32 % and 32 %
      Loaded rear weight distribution 68 % and 68 %

      Operation

      Tyre size 18.00-33-28 and 24.00R35

      Motor

      Manufacturer Cummins and Komatsu
      Model KT1150 and SAA6D170E
      Aspiration turbocharging and turbocharging

      Gear box

      Transmission type planetary gear and automatic
      Reverse gears number 1 and 1

      Dump

      Nominal payload 29029.9 kg and 57152.6 kg

      Images