vs.

      Komatsu HD465-5 vs. Caterpillar 769D

      11 reasons to buy Komatsu HD465-5:

      Weight

      Unloaded rear weight distribution 53 % and 50.3 % 5 % more or 2.7 %
      Loaded rear weight distribution 68 % and 66.8 % 2 % more or 1.2 %

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 780 l. and 530 l. 32 % more or 250 l.
      Cooling system fluid volume 171 l. and 113.5 l. 34 % more or 57.5 l.
      Engine oil volume 52 l. and 45 l. 13 % more or 7 l.
      Differential/final drive fluid volume 126.5 l. and 83 l. 34 % more or 43.5 l.

      Motor

      Displacement 23.2 l. and 18 l. 22 % more or 5.2 l.
      Full power 551.1 kW and 380.3 kW 31 % more or 170.8 kW
      Effective power 533.2 kW and 361.7 kW 32 % more or 171.5 kW

      Dump

      Brimmed lifting capacity 25 m3 and 17 m3 32 % more or 8 m3
      Lifting capacity with top 34.2 m3 and 24.2 m3 29 % more or 10.0 m3

      6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 769D:

      Weight

      Unloaded front weight distribution 49.7 % and 47 % 5 % more or 2.7 %
      Loaded front weight distribution 33.2 % and 32 % 4 % more or 1.2 %

      Operation

      Hydraulic system fluid volume 155 l. and 95 l. 39 % more or 60 l.

      Gear box

      Forward gears number 8 and 7 12 % more or 1
      Maximum speed 77.7 km/h and 70 km/h 10 % more or 7.7 km/h

      Dump

      Lifting time 7.5 sec and 11.5 sec 35 % less or 4.0 sec

      Neutral reasons:

      Weight

      Laden weight 96100 kg and 71400 kg
      Weight without load 42500 kg and 35420 kg

      Operation

      Tyre size 24.00R35 and 18-R33

      Motor

      Power measured at 2000 rev / min and 2000 rev / min
      Manufacturer Komatsu and Caterpillar
      Model SAA6D170E and 3408ETA

      Gear box

      Reverse gears number 1 and 1

      Dump

      Nominal payload 49895.2 kg and 35833.8 kg

      Images