- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Dump Truck/
- Komatsu HD465-5 vs. Caterpillar 773B
Komatsu HD465-5 vs. Caterpillar 773B
8 reasons to buy Komatsu HD465-5:
Weight
| Loaded rear weight distribution | 68 % and 66.7 % | 2 % more or 1.3 % |
| Unloaded rear weight distribution | 53 % and 52.7 % | 1 % more or 0.3 % |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 780 l. and 700 l. | 10 % more or 80 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 171 l. and 151 l. | 12 % more or 20 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 551.1 kW and 509 kW | 8 % more or 42.1 kW |
| Effective power | 533.2 kW and 485 kW | 9 % more or 48.2 kW |
Gear box
| Maximum speed | 70 km/h and 57.3 km/h | 18 % more or 12.7 km/h |
Dump
| Lifting capacity with top | 34.2 m3 and 34.1 m3 | 0 % more or 0.1 m3 |
7 reasons to buy Caterpillar 773B:
Weight
| Unloaded front weight distribution | 47.3 % and 47 % | 1 % more or 0.3 % |
| Loaded front weight distribution | 33.3 % and 32 % | 4 % more or 1.3 % |
Operation
| Engine oil volume | 68 l. and 52 l. | 24 % more or 16 l. |
| Differential/final drive fluid volume | 155 l. and 126.5 l. | 18 % more or 28.5 l. |
Motor
| Displacement | 27 l. and 23.2 l. | 14 % more or 3.8 l. |
Dump
| Brimmed lifting capacity | 26 m3 and 25 m3 | 4 % more or 1 m3 |
| Lifting time | 11.4 sec and 11.5 sec | 1 % less or 0.1 sec |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Weight without load | 42500 kg and 39396 kg |
| Laden weight | 96100 kg and 92534 kg |
Operation
| Tyre size | 24.00R35 and 21.00-35 32PR (E-3) |
Motor
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging and cooling at the outlet |
| Power measured at | 2000 rev / min and 2000 rev / min |
| Manufacturer | Komatsu and Caterpillar |
| Model | SAA6D170E and 3412 |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 7 and 7 |
| Reverse gears number | 1 and 1 |
Dump
| Nominal payload | 49895.2 kg and 53977.5 kg |
Images