vs.

      Komatsu HD465-5 vs. Caterpillar 785C

      5 reasons to buy Komatsu HD465-5:

      Weight

      Loaded rear weight distribution 68 % and 67 % 1 % more or 1 %

      Motor

      Power measured at 2000 rev / min and 1750 rev / min 12 % more or 250 rev

      Gear box

      Maximum speed 70 km/h and 54.8 km/h 22 % more or 15.2 km/h
      Forward gears number 7 and 6 14 % more or 1

      Dump

      Lifting time 11.5 sec and 15.2 sec 24 % less or 3.7 sec

      12 reasons to buy Caterpillar 785C:

      Weight

      Loaded front weight distribution 33 % and 32 % 3 % more or 1 %

      Operation

      Hydraulic system fluid volume 641 l. and 95 l. 85 % more or 546 l.
      Fuel Capacity 1893 l. and 780 l. 59 % more or 1113 l.
      Cooling system fluid volume 379 l. and 171 l. 55 % more or 208 l.
      Engine oil volume 90 l. and 52 l. 42 % more or 38 l.
      Differential/final drive fluid volume 436 l. and 126.5 l. 71 % more or 309.5 l.

      Motor

      Full power 1082 kW and 551.1 kW 49 % more or 530.9 kW
      Effective power 1005 kW and 533.2 kW 47 % more or 471.8 kW
      Displacement 51.8 l. and 23.2 l. 55 % more or 28.6 l.
      Cylinders number 16 and 6 62 % more or 10

      Dump

      Brimmed lifting capacity 74 m3 and 25 m3 66 % more or 49 m3
      Lifting capacity with top 91 m3 and 34.2 m3 62 % more or 56.8 m3

      Neutral reasons:

      Weight

      Weight without load 42500 kg and 102150 kg
      Laden weight 96100 kg and 249480 kg
      Unloaded front weight distribution 47 % and 47 %
      Unloaded rear weight distribution 53 % and 53 %

      Operation

      Tyre size 24.00R35 and 33.00-R51 tires

      Motor

      Model SAA6D170E and 3512B-EUI
      Manufacturer Komatsu and Caterpillar
      Aspiration turbocharging and turbocharging

      Gear box

      Reverse gears number 1 and 1
      Transmission type automatic and 6-speed planetary

      Dump

      Nominal payload 49895.2 kg and 136077.7 kg

      Images