vs.

      Komatsu HD465-5 vs. Caterpillar 789C

      5 reasons to buy Komatsu HD465-5:

      Weight

      Loaded rear weight distribution 68 % and 67 % 1 % more or 1 %

      Motor

      Power measured at 2000 rev / min and 1750 rev / min 12 % more or 250 rev

      Gear box

      Forward gears number 7 and 6 14 % more or 1
      Maximum speed 70 km/h and 52.6 km/h 25 % more or 17.4 km/h

      Dump

      Lifting time 11.5 sec and 18.9 sec 39 % less or 7.4 sec

      12 reasons to buy Caterpillar 789C:

      Weight

      Loaded front weight distribution 33 % and 32 % 3 % more or 1 %

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 3222 l. and 780 l. 76 % more or 2442 l.
      Cooling system fluid volume 663 l. and 171 l. 74 % more or 492 l.
      Engine oil volume 76 l. and 52 l. 32 % more or 24 l.
      Differential/final drive fluid volume 583 l. and 126.5 l. 78 % more or 456.5 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 531 l. and 95 l. 82 % more or 436 l.

      Motor

      Cylinders number 16 and 6 62 % more or 10
      Full power 1417 kW and 551.1 kW 61 % more or 865.9 kW
      Effective power 1320 kW and 533.2 kW 60 % more or 786.8 kW
      Displacement 69 l. and 23.2 l. 66 % more or 45.8 l.

      Dump

      Brimmed lifting capacity 92 m3 and 25 m3 73 % more or 67 m3
      Lifting capacity with top 105 m3 and 34.2 m3 67 % more or 70.8 m3

      Neutral reasons:

      Weight

      Weight without load 42500 kg and 135670 kg
      Laden weight 96100 kg and 317515 kg
      Unloaded front weight distribution 47 % and 47 %
      Unloaded rear weight distribution 53 % and 53 %

      Operation

      Tyre size 24.00R35 and 37.00-R57(E4)

      Motor

      Aspiration turbocharging and turbocharging
      Manufacturer Komatsu and Caterpillar
      Model SAA6D170E and 3516B EUI

      Gear box

      Transmission type automatic and 6-planetary gear shift with direct injection
      Reverse gears number 1 and 1

      Dump

      Nominal payload 49895.2 kg and 176901 kg

      Images