vs.

      Komatsu HD465-5 vs. Caterpillar 793D

      6 reasons to buy Komatsu HD465-5:

      Weight

      Unloaded front weight distribution 47 % and 46 % 2 % more or 1 %
      Loaded rear weight distribution 68 % and 67 % 1 % more or 1 %

      Motor

      Power measured at 2000 rev / min and 1750 rev / min 12 % more or 250 rev

      Gear box

      Forward gears number 7 and 6 14 % more or 1
      Maximum speed 70 km/h and 54.3 km/h 22 % more or 15.7 km/h

      Dump

      Lifting time 11.5 sec and 20.3 sec 43 % less or 8.8 sec

      13 reasons to buy Caterpillar 793D:

      Weight

      Unloaded rear weight distribution 54 % and 53 % 2 % more or 1 %
      Loaded front weight distribution 33 % and 32 % 3 % more or 1 %

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 4354 l. and 780 l. 82 % more or 3574 l.
      Cooling system fluid volume 973 l. and 171 l. 82 % more or 802 l.
      Engine oil volume 265 l. and 52 l. 80 % more or 213 l.
      Differential/final drive fluid volume 265 l. and 126.5 l. 52 % more or 138.5 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 769 l. and 95 l. 88 % more or 674 l.

      Motor

      Displacement 78 l. and 23.2 l. 70 % more or 54.8 l.
      Full power 1801 kW and 551.1 kW 69 % more or 1249.9 kW
      Effective power 1743 kW and 533.2 kW 69 % more or 1209.8 kW
      Cylinders number 16 and 6 62 % more or 10

      Dump

      Brimmed lifting capacity 96 m3 and 25 m3 74 % more or 71 m3
      Lifting capacity with top 129 m3 and 34.2 m3 73 % more or 94.8 m3

      Neutral reasons:

      Weight

      Weight without load 42500 kg and 159662 kg
      Laden weight 96100 kg and 383749 kg

      Operation

      Tyre size 24.00R35 and 40.00-R57(E4)

      Motor

      Manufacturer Komatsu and Caterpillar
      Model SAA6D170E and 3516B HD EUI
      Aspiration turbocharging and turbocharging

      Gear box

      Transmission type automatic and 6-speed planetary powershift
      Reverse gears number 1 and 1

      Dump

      Nominal payload 49895.2 kg and 217724.4 kg

      Images