vs.

      Komatsu HD465-5 vs. Komatsu HD320-3

      10 reasons to buy Komatsu HD465-5:

      Weight

      Unloaded rear weight distribution 53 % and 52 % 2 % more or 1 %

      Operation

      Cooling system fluid volume 171 l. and 133 l. 22 % more or 38 l.
      Differential/final drive fluid volume 126.5 l. and 71 l. 44 % more or 55.5 l.
      Engine oil volume 52 l. and 25 l. 52 % more or 27 l.
      Fuel Capacity 780 l. and 500 l. 36 % more or 280 l.

      Motor

      Full power 551.1 kW and 302 kW 45 % more or 249.1 kW
      Displacement 23.2 l. and 14 l. 40 % more or 9.2 l.

      Gear box

      Forward gears number 7 and 6 14 % more or 1
      Maximum speed 70 km/h and 62 km/h 11 % more or 8 km/h

      Dump

      Lifting capacity with top 34.2 m3 and 24 m3 30 % more or 10.2 m3

      2 reasons to buy Komatsu HD320-3:

      Weight

      Unloaded front weight distribution 48 % and 47 % 2 % more or 1 %

      Operation

      Hydraulic system fluid volume 110 l. and 95 l. 14 % more or 15 l.

      Neutral reasons:

      Weight

      Weight without load 42500 kg and 25750 kg
      Laden weight 96100 kg and 57750 kg
      Loaded front weight distribution 32 % and 32 %
      Loaded rear weight distribution 68 % and 68 %

      Operation

      Tyre size 24.00R35 and 18.00-25-32

      Motor

      Manufacturer Komatsu and Cummins
      Model SAA6D170E and NTA855
      Aspiration turbocharging and turbocharging

      Gear box

      Transmission type automatic and Komatsu Torqueflow Transmission (with the flow of torque) of planetary type
      Reverse gears number 1 and 1

      Dump

      Nominal payload 49895.2 kg and 29029.9 kg

      Images