- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Excavator/
- Caterpillar 365C FS vs. Caterpillar E650
Caterpillar 365C FS vs. Caterpillar E650
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar 365C FS:
Sizes
| Caterpillar track length | 5860 mm and 5420 mm | 8 % more or 440 mm |
| Clearance | 840 mm and 670 mm | 20 % more or 170 mm |
| Upper structure clearance | 1540 mm and 1320 mm | 14 % more or 220 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 800 l. and 625 l. | 22 % more or 175 l. |
Motor
| Displacement | 15.2 l. and 12.9 l. | 15 % more or 2.3 l. |
1 reasons to buy Caterpillar E650:
Carrier
| Maximum travel speed | 4.6 km/h and 4.1 km/h | 11 % more or 0.5 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Width between caterpillar tracks | 3900 mm and 3490 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 4570 mm and 3610 mm |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Mitsubishi |
| Model | C15 diesel with ACERT techonlogy and C S6B-TA |
Carrier
| Backhoe shovel support width 1 | 650 mm and 610 mm |
| Backhoe shovel support width 2 | 610 mm and 760 mm |
| Backhoe shovel support width 3 | 750 mm and 910 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 3900 mm | 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 3490 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 840 mm | 5. Clearance | 670 mm |
| 7. Height to cab upper part | 4570 mm | 7. Height to cab upper part | 3610 mm |