- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Excavator/
- Caterpillar E650 vs. Komatsu PC650-1
Caterpillar E650 vs. Komatsu PC650-1
3 reasons to buy Caterpillar E650:
Sizes
| Clearance | 670 mm and 620 mm | 7 % more or 50 mm |
| Upper structure clearance | 1320 mm and 1175 mm | 11 % more or 145 mm |
Carrier
| Maximum travel speed | 4.6 km/h and 4.1 km/h | 11 % more or 0.5 km/h |
8 reasons to buy Komatsu PC650-1:
Sizes
| Caterpillar track length | 5765 mm and 5420 mm | 6 % more or 345 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 850 l. and 625 l. | 26 % more or 225 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 305.7 kW and 280 kW | 8 % more or 25.7 kW |
| Displacement | 18.8 l. and 12.9 l. | 31 % more or 5.9 l. |
Loading bucket
| Maximum unloading height | 7460 mm and 7390 mm | 1 % more or 70 mm |
| Maximum digging radius | 10000 mm and 9800 mm | 2 % more or 200 mm |
Carrier
| Loading shovel operational weight | 68500 kg and 66000 kg | 4 % more or 2500 kg |
| Bucket loader specific ground pressure | 109.6 kPa and 113.8 kPa | 4 % less or 4.2 kPa |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Width between caterpillar tracks | 3490 mm and 3910 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3610 mm and 4430 mm |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi and Komatsu |
| Model | C S6B-TA and Cummins KT-1150-C450 |
Loading bucket
| Maximum cut height | 10500 mm and 10600 mm |
Carrier
| Bucket loader support width | 610 mm and 610 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 3490 mm | 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 3910 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 670 mm | 5. Clearance | 620 mm |
| 7. Height to cab upper part | 3610 mm | 7. Height to cab upper part | 4430 mm |
Loading bucket
| 18. Maximum unloading height | 7390 mm | 18. Maximum unloading height | 7460 mm |
| 19. Maximum digging radius | 9800 mm | 19. Maximum digging radius | 10000 mm |
| 17. Maximum cut height | 10500 mm | 17. Maximum cut height | 10600 mm |
Carrier
| 14. Bucket loader support width | 610 mm | 14. Bucket loader support width | 610 mm |