- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Excavator/
- Komatsu PC8000 vs. Caterpillar E650
Komatsu PC8000 vs. Caterpillar E650
4 reasons to buy Komatsu PC8000:
Shovel boom/sections 1
| Maximum radius on ground level | 19730 mm and 13330 mm | 32 % more or 6400 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 14000 l. and 625 l. | 96 % more or 13375 l. |
Loading bucket
| Maximum digging radius | 16100 mm and 9800 mm | 39 % more or 6300 mm |
Carrier
| Bucket loader support width | 5340 mm and 610 mm | 89 % more or 4730 mm |
2 reasons to buy Caterpillar E650:
Shovel boom/sections 1
| Maximum excavation depth | 8800 mm and 8090 mm | 8 % more or 710 mm |
Carrier
| Maximum travel speed | 4.6 km/h and 2.2 km/h | 52 % more or 2.4 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Shovel boom/sections 1
| Backhoe shovel boom / section | Boom 37'9" (11500mm) / Section 18' (5500mm) and Section 11'5" (3470mm) |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Komatsu and Mitsubishi |
| Model | 2 x SDA16V160 and C S6B-TA |
Carrier
| Backhoe shovel support width 1 | 4600 mm and 610 mm |
Images
Loading bucket
| 19. Maximum digging radius | 16100 mm | 19. Maximum digging radius | 9800 mm |
Carrier
| 14. Bucket loader support width | 5340 mm | 14. Bucket loader support width | 610 mm |