- Home/
- Comparison/
- Asphalt Spreader/
- Caterpillar AP1055D vs. Ingersoll Rand PF6170
Caterpillar AP1055D vs. Ingersoll Rand PF6170
3 reasons to buy Caterpillar AP1055D:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 461.8 l. and 302.8 l. | 34 % more or 159.0 l. |
Motor
Effective power | 164.8 kW and 152.9 kW | 7 % more or 11.9 kW |
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 18 % more or 400 rev |
4 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PF6170:
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 236.6 l. and 149.1 l. | 37 % more or 87.5 l. |
Hopper/stacker
Maximum travel speed | 19.3 km/h and 14.5 km/h | 25 % more or 4.8 km/h |
Hopper volume | 6.5 m3 and 6.1 m3 | 6 % more or 0.4 m3 |
Maximum paving speed | 90.5 m/min and 67.1 m/min | 26 % more or 23.4 m/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Transport width | 3330 mm and 2997 mm |
Transport height | 2820 mm and 3556 mm |
Length with screed | 6540 mm and 5232 mm |
Width with open hopper | 3310 mm and 3277 mm |
Operation
Operating weight without screed | 17046 kg and 16384.7 kg |
Operational weight with screed | 20470.6 kg and 18439.4 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
Model | C7 and QSB 6.7 3 level |
Hopper/stacker
Auger conveyor diameter | 406.4 mm and 431.8 mm |
Paving width in folded state | 3048 mm and 3050 mm |
Images
Sizes
1. Length with screed | 6540 mm | 1. Length with screed | 5232 mm |
2. Transport width | 3330 mm | 2. Transport width | 2997 mm |
3. Transport height | 2820 mm | 3. Transport height | 3556 mm |