- Home/
- Comparison/
- Asphalt Spreader/
- Caterpillar BG260C vs. Ingersoll Rand PF150
Caterpillar BG260C vs. Ingersoll Rand PF150
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar BG260C:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 265 l. and 114 l. | 57 % more or 151 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 189 l. and 91 l. | 52 % more or 98 l. |
Hopper/stacker
| Maximum paving speed | 114 m/min and 40.8 m/min | 64 % more or 73.2 m/min |
| Maximum travel speed | 23.5 km/h and 18.7 km/h | 20 % more or 4.8 km/h |
| Hopper volume | 5.8 m3 and 3 m3 | 48 % more or 2.8 m3 |
| Maximum paving width | 7925 mm and 3960 mm | 50 % more or 3965 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Transport width | 3048 mm and 2500 mm |
| Transport height | 2769 mm and 2970 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2540 mm and 2134 mm |
| Length with screed | 6783 mm and 4650 mm |
Operation
| Operating weight without screed | 16170 kg and 5575 kg |
Motor
| Model | 3116TA and F3L912 |
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Deutz |
Hopper/stacker
| Auger conveyor diameter | 406 mm and 279 mm |
| Paving width in folded state | 2438 mm and 2440 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 3. Transport height | 2769 mm | 3. Transport height | 2970 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2540 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2134 mm |
| 1. Length with screed | 6783 mm | 1. Length with screed | 4650 mm |
| 2. Transport width | 3048 mm | 2. Transport width | 2500 mm |