- Home/
- Comparison/
- Asphalt Spreader/
- Dynapac F141C vs. Ingersoll Rand PF6160
Dynapac F141C vs. Ingersoll Rand PF6160
1 reasons to buy Dynapac F141C:
Hopper/stacker
| Maximum paving width | 9000 mm and 7920 mm | 12 % more or 1080 mm |
4 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PF6160:
Hopper/stacker
| Maximum paving speed | 90.5 m/min and 23 m/min | 75 % more or 67.5 m/min |
| Maximum travel speed | 19.3 km/h and 4.5 km/h | 77 % more or 14.8 km/h |
| Maximum coating thickness | 304.8 mm and 300 mm | 2 % more or 4.8 mm |
| Hopper volume | 6.5 m3 and 6 m3 | 8 % more or 0.5 m3 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Width with open hopper | 3388 mm and 3277 mm |
| Transport width | 2550 mm and 2997 mm |
| Transport height | 3110 mm and 3556 mm |
Operation
| Operational weight with screed | 18500 kg and 18303.4 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Deutz and Cummins |
| Model | TCD 2013 L06 and QSB 6.7 3 level |
| Power measured at | 1800 rev / min and 1800 rev / min |
Hopper/stacker
| Paving width in folded state | 2500 mm and 3050 mm |
| Auger conveyor diameter | 380 mm and 432 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Transport width | 2550 mm | 2. Transport width | 2997 mm |
| 3. Transport height | 3110 mm | 3. Transport height | 3556 mm |