- Home/
- Comparison/
- Asphalt Spreader/
- Dynapac F8C vs. Ingersoll Rand PF4410
Dynapac F8C vs. Ingersoll Rand PF4410
1 reasons to buy Dynapac F8C:
Hopper/stacker
| Maximum coating thickness | 270 mm and 203.2 mm | 25 % more or 66.8 mm |
4 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PF4410:
Hopper/stacker
| Maximum paving width | 7620 mm and 6100 mm | 20 % more or 1520 mm |
| Maximum paving speed | 73.8 m/min and 22.4 m/min | 70 % more or 51.4 m/min |
| Hopper volume | 4.4 m3 and 3.7 m3 | 16 % more or 0.7 m3 |
| Maximum travel speed | 13.7 km/h and 4.4 km/h | 68 % more or 9.3 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Length with screed | 5530 mm and 5240 mm |
| Width with open hopper | 2940 mm and 3180 mm |
| Transport width | 2000 mm and 2500 mm |
| Transport height | 3335 mm and 3130 mm |
Operation
| Operational weight with screed | 11339.8 kg and 14288 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Deutz and Cummins |
| Model | BF 4M 2012 and QSB 5.9-3OT |
Hopper/stacker
| Paving width in folded state | 2000 mm and 2440 mm |
| Auger conveyor diameter | 310 mm and 406.4 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length with screed | 5530 mm | 1. Length with screed | 5240 mm |
| 2. Transport width | 2000 mm | 2. Transport width | 2500 mm |
| 3. Transport height | 3335 mm | 3. Transport height | 3130 mm |