- Home/
- Comparison/
- Asphalt Spreader/
- Dynapac F8W vs. Caterpillar AP1050B
Dynapac F8W vs. Caterpillar AP1050B
1 reasons to buy Dynapac F8W:
Hopper/stacker
| Maximum travel speed | 20 km/h and 8 km/h | 60 % more or 12 km/h |
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar AP1050B:
Motor
| Full power | 129.8 kW and 66 kW | 49 % more or 63.8 kW |
Hopper/stacker
| Hopper volume | 6.1 m3 and 4 m3 | 34 % more or 2.1 m3 |
| Maximum paving width | 9144 mm and 5500 mm | 40 % more or 3644 mm |
| Maximum paving speed | 65.6 m/min and 35 m/min | 47 % more or 30.6 m/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Length with screed | 5275 mm and 6579 mm |
| Transport width | 2000 mm and 3048 mm |
Motor
| Model | BF4M 2012 and 3116T |
| Manufacturer | Deutz and Caterpillar |
Hopper/stacker
| Paving width in folded state | 2000 mm and 2438 mm |
| Auger conveyor diameter | 310 mm and 406 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length with screed | 5275 mm | 1. Length with screed | 6579 mm |
| 2. Transport width | 2000 mm | 2. Transport width | 3048 mm |