- Home/
- Comparison/
- Asphalt Spreader/
- Dynapac F9W vs. Ingersoll Rand PF161
Dynapac F9W vs. Ingersoll Rand PF161
2 reasons to buy Dynapac F9W:
Hopper/stacker
| Maximum coating thickness | 270 mm and 203.2 mm | 25 % more or 66.8 mm |
| Maximum travel speed | 20 km/h and 15.9 km/h | 20 % more or 4.1 km/h |
3 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PF161:
Hopper/stacker
| Hopper volume | 5.1 m3 and 4 m3 | 22 % more or 1.1 m3 |
| Maximum paving width | 5800 mm and 5300 mm | 9 % more or 500 mm |
| Maximum paving speed | 59.8 m/min and 35 m/min | 41 % more or 24.8 m/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Length with screed | 5420 mm and 5240 mm |
| Width with open hopper | 3040 mm and 3220 mm |
| Transport width | 2000 mm and 2500 mm |
| Transport height | 3335 mm and 3050 mm |
Operation
| Operational weight with screed | 12247 kg and 10432.6 kg |
Motor
| Model | BF 4M 202C and Elite 4BTA 3.9 |
| Manufacturer | Deutz and Cummins |
Hopper/stacker
| Paving width in folded state | 2300 mm and 2440 mm |
| Auger conveyor diameter | 310 mm and 406.4 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 3. Transport height | 3335 mm | 3. Transport height | 3050 mm |
| 1. Length with screed | 5420 mm | 1. Length with screed | 5240 mm |
| 2. Transport width | 2000 mm | 2. Transport width | 2500 mm |