- Home/
- Comparison/
- Asphalt Spreader/
- Ingersoll Rand PF161 vs. Caterpillar AP1050B
Ingersoll Rand PF161 vs. Caterpillar AP1050B
2 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PF161:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 189 l. and 151.4 l. | 20 % more or 37.6 l. |
Hopper/stacker
| Maximum travel speed | 15.9 km/h and 8 km/h | 50 % more or 7.9 km/h |
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar AP1050B:
Operation
| Cooling system fluid volume | 31.5 l. and 24.6 l. | 22 % more or 6.9 l. |
| Fuel Capacity | 284 l. and 144 l. | 49 % more or 140 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Hopper/stacker
| Maximum paving width | 9144 mm and 5800 mm | 37 % more or 3344 mm |
| Maximum paving speed | 65.6 m/min and 59.8 m/min | 9 % more or 5.8 m/min |
| Hopper volume | 6.1 m3 and 5.1 m3 | 16 % more or 1.0 m3 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Length with screed | 5240 mm and 6579 mm |
| Transport width | 2500 mm and 3048 mm |
Operation
| Operating weight without screed | 9230.6 kg and 15785 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
| Model | Elite 4BTA 3.9 and 3116T |
Hopper/stacker
| Paving width in folded state | 2440 mm and 2438 mm |
| Auger conveyor diameter | 406.4 mm and 406 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length with screed | 5240 mm | 1. Length with screed | 6579 mm |
| 2. Transport width | 2500 mm | 2. Transport width | 3048 mm |