- Home/
- Comparison/
- Asphalt Spreader/
- Ingersoll Rand PF3200 vs. Caterpillar BG260C
Ingersoll Rand PF3200 vs. Caterpillar BG260C
3 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PF3200:
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 204 l. and 189 l. | 7 % more or 15 l. |
Hopper/stacker
Hopper volume | 6.4 m3 and 5.8 m3 | 9 % more or 0.6 m3 |
Maximum paving width | 9140 mm and 7925 mm | 13 % more or 1215 mm |
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar BG260C:
Operation
Cooling system fluid volume | 37 l. and 26.5 l. | 28 % more or 10.5 l. |
Fuel Capacity | 265 l. and 204 l. | 23 % more or 61 l. |
Hopper/stacker
Maximum paving speed | 114 m/min and 82 m/min | 28 % more or 32 m/min |
Maximum travel speed | 23.5 km/h and 17.5 km/h | 26 % more or 6.0 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Transport width | 3050 mm and 3048 mm |
Transport height | 3150 mm and 2769 mm |
Length with screed | 6350 mm and 6783 mm |
Wheelbase | 3150 mm and 2540 mm |
Operation
Operating weight without screed | 13381 kg and 16170 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
Model | QSB 5.9-30TAA and 3116TA |
Hopper/stacker
Paving width in folded state | 3050 mm and 2438 mm |
Auger conveyor diameter | 406.4 mm and 406 mm |
Images
Sizes
1. Length with screed | 6350 mm | 1. Length with screed | 6783 mm |
2. Transport width | 3050 mm | 2. Transport width | 3048 mm |
3. Transport height | 3150 mm | 3. Transport height | 2769 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 3150 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2540 mm |