- Home/
- Comparison/
- Asphalt Spreader/
- Ingersoll Rand PF3200 vs. Roadtec RP175
Ingersoll Rand PF3200 vs. Roadtec RP175
7 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PF3200:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 204 l. and 185 l. | 9 % more or 19 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 26.5 l. and 19 l. | 28 % more or 7.5 l. |
| Generator current strength | 130 amperes and 115 amperes | 12 % more or 15 amperes |
Hopper/stacker
| Hopper volume | 6.4 m3 and 5.2 m3 | 19 % more or 1.2 m3 |
| Maximum paving width | 9140 mm and 4876.8 mm | 47 % more or 4263.2 mm |
| Maximum paving speed | 82 m/min and 61 m/min | 26 % more or 21 m/min |
| Maximum travel speed | 17.5 km/h and 11.3 km/h | 35 % more or 6.2 km/h |
1 reasons to buy Roadtec RP175:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 360 l. and 204 l. | 43 % more or 156 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Transport height | 3150 mm and 3810 mm |
| Length with screed | 6350 mm and 6100 mm |
| Width with open hopper | 3150 mm and 3150 mm |
Operation
| Operating weight without screed | 13381 kg and 15104.6 kg |
| Operational weight with screed | 14832.5 kg and 17508.7 kg |
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
Hopper/stacker
| Paving width in folded state | 3050 mm and 2438.4 mm |
| Auger conveyor diameter | 406.4 mm and 355.6 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length with screed | 6350 mm | 1. Length with screed | 6100 mm |
| 3. Transport height | 3150 mm | 3. Transport height | 3810 mm |