vs.

      Ingersoll Rand PF6160 vs. Caterpillar BG260C

      3 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PF6160:

      Operation

      Hydraulic system fluid volume 236.6 l. and 189 l. 20 % more or 47.6 l.
      Fuel Capacity 303 l. and 265 l. 13 % more or 38 l.

      Hopper/stacker

      Hopper volume 6.5 m3 and 5.8 m3 11 % more or 0.7 m3

      4 reasons to buy Caterpillar BG260C:

      Motor

      Power measured at 2200 rev / min and 1800 rev / min 18 % more or 400 rev

      Hopper/stacker

      Maximum paving width 7925 mm and 7920 mm 0 % more or 5 mm
      Maximum paving speed 114 m/min and 90.5 m/min 21 % more or 23.5 m/min
      Maximum travel speed 23.5 km/h and 19.3 km/h 18 % more or 4.2 km/h

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Tyre size 18x25 and 16x22 hard rubber, 18x25-16 layers of peat soil or sand
      Wheelbase 2616 mm and 2540 mm
      Length with screed 5232 mm and 6783 mm
      Transport width 2997 mm and 3048 mm
      Transport height 3556 mm and 2769 mm

      Operation

      Operating weight without screed 16384.7 kg and 16170 kg

      Motor

      Manufacturer Cummins and Caterpillar
      Model QSB 6.7 3 level and 3116TA

      Hopper/stacker

      Paving width in folded state 3050 mm and 2438 mm
      Auger conveyor diameter 432 mm and 406 mm

      Images

      Sizes

      1. Length with screed 5232 mm 1. Length with screed 6783 mm
      2. Transport width 2997 mm 2. Transport width 3048 mm
      3. Transport height 3556 mm 3. Transport height 2769 mm
      4. Wheelbase 2616 mm 4. Wheelbase 2540 mm