- Home/
- Comparison/
- Asphalt Spreader/
- Ingersoll Rand PF6170 vs. Dynapac F9W
Ingersoll Rand PF6170 vs. Dynapac F9W
4 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PF6170:
Hopper/stacker
Maximum paving speed | 90.5 m/min and 35 m/min | 61 % more or 55.5 m/min |
Maximum paving width | 7920 mm and 5300 mm | 33 % more or 2620 mm |
Maximum coating thickness | 304.8 mm and 270 mm | 11 % more or 34.8 mm |
Hopper volume | 6.5 m3 and 4 m3 | 38 % more or 2.5 m3 |
1 reasons to buy Dynapac F9W:
Hopper/stacker
Maximum travel speed | 20 km/h and 19.3 km/h | 3 % more or 0.7 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Length with screed | 5232 mm and 5420 mm |
Width with open hopper | 3277 mm and 3040 mm |
Transport width | 2997 mm and 2000 mm |
Transport height | 3556 mm and 3335 mm |
Operation
Operational weight with screed | 18439.4 kg and 12247 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Deutz |
Model | QSB 6.7 3 level and BF 4M 202C |
Hopper/stacker
Paving width in folded state | 3050 mm and 2300 mm |
Auger conveyor diameter | 431.8 mm and 310 mm |
Images
Sizes
1. Length with screed | 5232 mm | 1. Length with screed | 5420 mm |
2. Transport width | 2997 mm | 2. Transport width | 2000 mm |
3. Transport height | 3556 mm | 3. Transport height | 3335 mm |