- Home/
- Comparison/
- Asphalt Spreader/
- Mauldin 1550C vs. Ingersoll Rand PF6160
Mauldin 1550C vs. Ingersoll Rand PF6160
6 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PF6160:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 303 l. and 49.2 l. | 84 % more or 253.8 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 236.6 l. and 58.7 l. | 75 % more or 177.9 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 152.9 kW and 44.7 kW | 71 % more or 108.2 kW |
Hopper/stacker
| Maximum paving width | 7920 mm and 3962.4 mm | 50 % more or 3957.6 mm |
| Maximum paving speed | 90.5 m/min and 42.7 m/min | 53 % more or 47.8 m/min |
| Maximum travel speed | 19.3 km/h and 5.3 km/h | 73 % more or 14.0 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Width with open hopper | 3048 mm and 3277 mm |
| Length with screed | 3148.6 mm and 5232 mm |
| Transport width | 2590.8 mm and 2997 mm |
| Transport height | 1624.6 mm and 3556 mm |
Operation
| Operational weight with screed | 5669.9 kg and 18303.4 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | John Deere and Cummins |
Hopper/stacker
| Auger conveyor diameter | 228.6 mm and 432 mm |
| Paving width in folded state | 2438.4 mm and 3050 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length with screed | 3148.6 mm | 1. Length with screed | 5232 mm |
| 2. Transport width | 2590.8 mm | 2. Transport width | 2997 mm |
| 3. Transport height | 1624.6 mm | 3. Transport height | 3556 mm |