- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Caterpillar PF200 vs. Dynapac CP201
Caterpillar PF200 vs. Dynapac CP201
3 reasons to buy Caterpillar PF200:
Weight
| Operational weight with maximum ballast | 14000 kg and 15000 kg | 7 % less or 1000 kg |
Sizes
| Clearance | 350 mm and 260 mm | 26 % more or 90 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 160 l. and 100 l. | 37 % more or 60 l. |
5 reasons to buy Dynapac CP201:
Tyres
| Front tyres number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
| Rear tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
Operation
| Water spraying tank fluid volume | 4500 l. and 350 l. | 92 % more or 4150 l. |
| Maximum speed | 24.1 km/h and 24 km/h | 0 % more or 0.1 km/h |
Motor
| Displacement | 5.8 l. and 3.8 l. | 34 % more or 2.0 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 7000 kg and 8350 kg |
Tyres
| Standard tyre size | 11x80-20/C20 and 9.00-20-10 layers |
Sizes
| Overall width | 1720 mm and 2060 mm |
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2930 mm and 2530 mm |
| Dimensional length | 4500 mm and 4985 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3200 mm and 3700 mm |
Motor
| Model | F4L 912 and HIN0 W06D |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4500 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4985 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 1720 mm | 2. Overall width | 2060 mm |
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2930 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2530 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3200 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3700 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 350 mm | 5. Clearance | 260 mm |