- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Caterpillar PF200 vs. Ingersoll Rand PT125R
Caterpillar PF200 vs. Ingersoll Rand PT125R
2 reasons to buy Caterpillar PF200:
Weight
| Mean weight per wheel with maximum ballast load | 2000 kg and 1227 kg | 39 % more or 773 kg |
Sizes
| Clearance | 350 mm and 330 mm | 6 % more or 20 mm |
6 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PT125R:
Weight
| Operational weight with maximum ballast | 7580 kg and 14000 kg | 46 % less or 6420 kg |
Tyres
| Front tyres number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
| Rear tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 379 l. and 160 l. | 58 % more or 219 l. |
| Water spraying tank fluid volume | 379 l. and 350 l. | 8 % more or 29 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 64.1 kW and 49.2 kW | 23 % more or 14.9 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 7000 kg and 4125 kg |
Tyres
| Standard tyre size | 11x80-20/C20 and 7.5-15, 14 layers |
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4500 mm and 3895 mm |
| Overall width | 1720 mm and 1980 mm |
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2930 mm and 3225 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3200 mm and 2920 mm |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Deutz and Cummins |
| Model | F4L 912 and B 3.3T-85 |
Images
Sizes
| 5. Clearance | 350 mm | 5. Clearance | 330 mm |
| 1. Dimensional length | 4500 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3895 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 1720 mm | 2. Overall width | 1980 mm |
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2930 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3225 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3200 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2920 mm |