- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Caterpillar PS110 vs. Hypac C560H
Caterpillar PS110 vs. Hypac C560H
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar PS110:
Weight
| Operational weight with maximum ballast | 12415 kg and 27000.1 kg | 54 % less or 14585.1 kg |
Tyres
| Rear tyres number | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
| Front tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 38.6 km/h and 20 km/h | 48 % more or 18.6 km/h |
3 reasons to buy Hypac C560H:
Weight
| Mean weight per wheel with maximum ballast load | 3375.2 kg and 1134 kg | 66 % more or 2241.2 kg |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 250 l. and 128 l. | 49 % more or 122 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 99.9 kW and 57.4 kW | 43 % more or 42.5 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 3827 kg and 13499.8 kg |
Tyres
| Standard tyre size | 7.5x15 and 11.00-20-18PR |
Sizes
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2489 mm and 3090 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3353 mm and 3700 mm |
| Dimensional length | 4140 mm and 4985 mm |
| Overall width | 2134 mm and 2118 mm |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Perkins and Deutz |
| Model | 4.2 and TCD 2012 L04 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4140 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4985 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2134 mm | 2. Overall width | 2118 mm |
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2489 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3090 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3353 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3700 mm |