- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Caterpillar PS150C vs. Bomag BW24R
Caterpillar PS150C vs. Bomag BW24R
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar PS150C:
Weight
Operational weight with maximum ballast | 12940 kg and 24000 kg | 46 % less or 11060 kg |
Mean weight per wheel in folded state | 545 kg and 1925 kg | 72 % less or 1380 kg |
Tyres
Front tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
Operation
Maximum speed | 25.6 km/h and 25 km/h | 2 % more or 0.6 km/h |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 54.9 l. and 6.1 l. | 89 % more or 48.8 l. |
6 reasons to buy Bomag BW24R:
Weight
Mean weight per wheel with maximum ballast load | 3000 kg and 1440 kg | 52 % more or 1560 kg |
Sizes
Clearance | 300 mm and 267 mm | 11 % more or 33 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 250 l. and 173 l. | 31 % more or 77 l. |
Cooling system fluid volume | 27 l. and 16.1 l. | 40 % more or 10.9 l. |
Water spraying tank fluid volume | 400 l. and 394 l. | 1 % more or 6 l. |
Motor
Full power | 82 kW and 75 kW | 9 % more or 7 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
Operational weight in folded state | 4885 kg and 15400 kg |
Tyres
Rear tyres number | 4 and 4 |
Standard tyre size | 8.50/90x15 6 layers and 11.00-20-18 layers |
Oscillating angle | 4.4 degrees and 4 degrees |
Wheel track/tyre overlap | 13 mm and 50 mm |
Sizes
Dimensional length | 4290 mm and 5075 mm |
Overall width | 1740 mm and 2265 mm |
Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3000 mm and 3080 mm |
Wheelbase | 3340 mm and 3800 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 12 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and BT |
Model | 3054C and Cummins 4 3.9C-105 |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 4290 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5075 mm |
2. Overall width | 1740 mm | 2. Overall width | 2265 mm |
3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3000 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3080 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 3340 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3800 mm |
5. Clearance | 267 mm | 5. Clearance | 300 mm |