- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Caterpillar PS150C vs. Bomag BW24RH
Caterpillar PS150C vs. Bomag BW24RH
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar PS150C:
Weight
| Operational weight with maximum ballast | 12940 kg and 24000 kg | 46 % less or 11060 kg |
Tyres
| Front tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 25.6 km/h and 20 km/h | 22 % more or 5.6 km/h |
Motor
| Full power | 75 kW and 73.8 kW | 2 % more or 1.2 kW |
5 reasons to buy Bomag BW24RH:
Weight
| Mean weight per wheel with maximum ballast load | 3000.1 kg and 1440 kg | 52 % more or 1560.1 kg |
Sizes
| Clearance | 300 mm and 267 mm | 11 % more or 33 mm |
Operation
| Water spraying tank fluid volume | 400 l. and 394 l. | 1 % more or 6 l. |
| Fuel Capacity | 250 l. and 173 l. | 31 % more or 77 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2300 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 4 % more or 100 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 4885 kg and 8650 kg |
Tyres
| Oscillating angle | 4.4 degrees and 4 degrees |
| Wheel track/tyre overlap | 13 mm and 42 mm |
| Rear tyres number | 4 and 4 |
| Standard tyre size | 8.50/90x15 6 layers and 11.00-20 18PR |
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4290 mm and 4985 mm |
| Overall width | 1740 mm and 2118 mm |
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3000 mm and 3090 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3340 mm and 3700 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 12 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Deutz |
| Model | 3054C and TCD 2012 L04 |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
| Cylinders number | 4 and 4 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4290 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4985 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 1740 mm | 2. Overall width | 2118 mm |
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3000 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3090 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3340 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3700 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 267 mm | 5. Clearance | 300 mm |