- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Caterpillar PS150C vs. Dynapac CP221
Caterpillar PS150C vs. Dynapac CP221
7 reasons to buy Caterpillar PS150C:
Weight
| Operational weight with maximum ballast | 12940 kg and 21000 kg | 38 % less or 8060 kg |
| Mean weight per wheel in folded state | 545 kg and 1180 kg | 54 % less or 635 kg |
Tyres
| Front tyres number | 5 and 3 | 40 % more or 2 |
Sizes
| Clearance | 267 mm and 230 mm | 14 % more or 37 mm |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 25.6 km/h and 23 km/h | 10 % more or 2.6 km/h |
| Fuel Capacity | 173 l. and 120 l. | 31 % more or 53 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 75 kW and 74 kW | 1 % more or 1 kW |
2 reasons to buy Dynapac CP221:
Weight
| Mean weight per wheel with maximum ballast load | 3000 kg and 1440 kg | 52 % more or 1560 kg |
Operation
| Water spraying tank fluid volume | 415 l. and 394 l. | 5 % more or 21 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 4885 kg and 8300 kg |
Tyres
| Rear tyres number | 4 and 4 |
| Standard tyre size | 8.50/90x15 6 layers and 13/80 R20 Radial |
| Wheel track/tyre overlap | 13 mm and 42 mm |
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 3340 mm and 3795 mm |
| Dimensional length | 4290 mm and 4750 mm |
| Overall width | 1740 mm and 1820 mm |
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3000 mm and 3300 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 12 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
| Model | 3054C and B4.5 T |
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4290 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4750 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 1740 mm | 2. Overall width | 1820 mm |
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3000 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3300 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3340 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3795 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 267 mm | 5. Clearance | 230 mm |