- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Caterpillar PS150C vs. Ingersoll Rand PT240R
Caterpillar PS150C vs. Ingersoll Rand PT240R
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar PS150C:
Weight
| Mean weight per wheel in folded state | 545 kg and 2045 kg | 73 % less or 1500 kg |
| Operational weight with maximum ballast | 12940 kg and 24000 kg | 46 % less or 11060 kg |
Tyres
| Front tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
Operation
| Water spraying tank fluid volume | 394 l. and 285 l. | 28 % more or 109 l. |
| Maximum speed | 25.6 km/h and 19 km/h | 26 % more or 6.6 km/h |
Motor
| Full power | 75 kW and 73.8 kW | 2 % more or 1.2 kW |
3 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PT240R:
Weight
| Mean weight per wheel with maximum ballast load | 2970 kg and 1440 kg | 52 % more or 1530 kg |
Sizes
| Clearance | 300 mm and 267 mm | 11 % more or 33 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 250 l. and 173 l. | 31 % more or 77 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 4885 kg and 16360 kg |
Tyres
| Oscillating angle | 4.4 degrees and 5 degrees |
| Wheel track/tyre overlap | 13 mm and 50 mm |
| Rear tyres number | 4 and 4 |
| Standard tyre size | 8.50/90x15 6 layers and 11X20 18 layers |
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4290 mm and 5440 mm |
| Overall width | 1740 mm and 2310 mm |
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3000 mm and 3040 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3340 mm and 3500 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 12 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and BT |
| Model | 3054C and Cummins 4.5-C99 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4290 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5440 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 1740 mm | 2. Overall width | 2310 mm |
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3000 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3040 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3340 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3500 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 267 mm | 5. Clearance | 300 mm |
