- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Caterpillar PS200B vs. YTO LRS1016
Caterpillar PS200B vs. YTO LRS1016
3 reasons to buy Caterpillar PS200B:
Tyres
| Front tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 19.3 km/h and 14 km/h | 27 % more or 5.3 km/h |
Motor
| Full power | 78.3 kW and 75 kW | 4 % more or 3.3 kW |
5 reasons to buy YTO LRS1016:
Weight
| Operational weight with maximum ballast | 16000 kg and 18143.7 kg | 12 % less or 2143.7 kg |
Tyres
| Rear tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 240 l. and 173 l. | 28 % more or 67 l. |
| Water spraying tank fluid volume | 480 l. and 394 l. | 18 % more or 86 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2400 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 8 % more or 200 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 4955.5 kg and 9000 kg |
Tyres
| Standard tyre size | 7.5 x 15-6 layers and 11.00-20.16 |
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4299 mm and 4770 mm |
| Overall width | 1750 mm and 2290 mm |
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3000 mm and 3162 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3352 mm and 3700 mm |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
| Model | 3054T and 4BT3.9 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4299 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4770 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 1750 mm | 2. Overall width | 2290 mm |
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3000 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3162 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3352 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3700 mm |