- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Dynapac CP142 vs. Caterpillar PS150C
Dynapac CP142 vs. Caterpillar PS150C
2 reasons to buy Dynapac CP142:
Weight
| Mean weight per wheel with maximum ballast load | 1560 kg and 1440 kg | 8 % more or 120 kg |
Operation
| Water spraying tank fluid volume | 500 l. and 394 l. | 21 % more or 106 l. |
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar PS150C:
Weight
| Mean weight per wheel in folded state | 545 kg and 670 kg | 19 % less or 125 kg |
| Operational weight with maximum ballast | 12940 kg and 14000 kg | 8 % less or 1060 kg |
Sizes
| Clearance | 267 mm and 234 mm | 12 % more or 33 mm |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 25.6 km/h and 19 km/h | 26 % more or 6.6 km/h |
| Fuel Capacity | 173 l. and 140 l. | 19 % more or 33 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 75 kW and 74 kW | 1 % more or 1 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 6000 kg and 4885 kg |
Tyres
| Front tyres number | 5 and 5 |
| Rear tyres number | 4 and 4 |
| Standard tyre size | 7.50-15 and 8.50/90x15 6 layers |
| Oscillating angle | 3 degrees and 4.4 degrees |
| Wheel track/tyre overlap | 12 mm and 13 mm |
Sizes
| Overall width | 1760 mm and 1740 mm |
| Dimensional length | 3580 mm and 4290 mm |
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2990 mm and 3000 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2760 mm and 3340 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
| Model | B4.5 T and 3054C |
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 3580 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4290 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 1760 mm | 2. Overall width | 1740 mm |
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2990 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3000 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2760 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3340 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 234 mm | 5. Clearance | 267 mm |
