- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Dynapac CP142 vs. Hypac C560H
Dynapac CP142 vs. Hypac C560H
3 reasons to buy Dynapac CP142:
Weight
| Operational weight with maximum ballast | 14000 kg and 27000.1 kg | 48 % less or 13000.1 kg |
Tyres
| Front tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
Operation
| Water spraying tank fluid volume | 500 l. and 400 l. | 20 % more or 100 l. |
4 reasons to buy Hypac C560H:
Weight
| Mean weight per wheel with maximum ballast load | 3375.2 kg and 1560 kg | 54 % more or 1815.2 kg |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 250 l. and 140 l. | 44 % more or 110 l. |
| Maximum speed | 20 km/h and 19 km/h | 5 % more or 1 km/h |
Motor
| Full power | 99.9 kW and 74 kW | 26 % more or 25.9 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 6000 kg and 13499.8 kg |
Tyres
| Wheel track/tyre overlap | 12 mm and 42 mm |
| Rear tyres number | 4 and 4 |
| Standard tyre size | 7.50-15 and 11.00-20-18PR |
| Oscillating angle | 3 degrees and 4 degrees |
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 2760 mm and 3700 mm |
| Dimensional length | 3580 mm and 4985 mm |
| Overall width | 1760 mm and 2118 mm |
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2990 mm and 3090 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
Motor
| Model | B4.5 T and TCD 2012 L04 |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Deutz |
Images
Sizes
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2990 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3090 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2760 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3700 mm |
| 1. Dimensional length | 3580 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4985 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 1760 mm | 2. Overall width | 2118 mm |
