- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Dynapac CP142 vs. YTO LRS1016
Dynapac CP142 vs. YTO LRS1016
4 reasons to buy Dynapac CP142:
Weight
Operational weight with maximum ballast | 14000 kg and 16000 kg | 12 % less or 2000 kg |
Tyres
Front tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
Operation
Water spraying tank fluid volume | 500 l. and 480 l. | 4 % more or 20 l. |
Maximum speed | 19 km/h and 14 km/h | 26 % more or 5 km/h |
4 reasons to buy YTO LRS1016:
Tyres
Rear tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 240 l. and 140 l. | 42 % more or 100 l. |
Motor
Full power | 75 kW and 74 kW | 1 % more or 1 kW |
Power measured at | 2400 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 8 % more or 200 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
Operational weight in folded state | 6000 kg and 9000 kg |
Tyres
Standard tyre size | 7.50-15 and 11.00-20.16 |
Wheel track/tyre overlap | 12 mm and 40 mm |
Sizes
Dimensional length | 3580 mm and 4770 mm |
Overall width | 1760 mm and 2290 mm |
Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2990 mm and 3162 mm |
Wheelbase | 2760 mm and 3700 mm |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Model | B4.5 T and 4BT3.9 |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 3580 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4770 mm |
2. Overall width | 1760 mm | 2. Overall width | 2290 mm |
3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2990 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3162 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 2760 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3700 mm |